An Act to provide for the regulation of private health facilities and for other purposes
This Act may be cited as the Private Health Facilities Act 1999.
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
3Main object of Act and its achievement
(1)The main object of this Act is to provide a framework for protecting the health and wellbeing of patients receiving health services at private health facilities.(2)The object is to be achieved mainly by—(a)enabling standards to be made for the provision of health services at private health facilities; and(b)requiring persons proposing to operate private health facilities to first hold approvals; and(c)requiring persons to hold licences for the operation of the facilities; and(d)providing for compliance with this Act to be monitored and enforced.
4Outline of approval and licensing requirements
(1)Only a licensee may operate a private health facility.See section 39 (Licences required to operate private health facilities).(2)Only the person operating the facility is required to be licensed (not, for example, another person who merely owns the facility).(3)A person may become the licensee of a private health facility only if—(a)the person first holds an approval for the facility; or(b)the person is the transferee of the licence for the facility; orSee part 6 (Licences), division 7 (Dealings affecting licences), subdivision 3 (Transfers of licences).(c)the person is the personal representative of a deceased licensee’s estate and is taken to be a licensee under section 75.
This Act binds all persons, including the State.
The dictionary in schedule 3 defines particular words used in this Act.
A health service is a service provided to a person for maintaining, improving or restoring the person’s health and wellbeing.
8Meaning of private health facility
A private health facility is—(a)a private hospital; or(b)a day hospital.
(1)A private hospital is a facility at which health services are provided to persons who are discharged from the facility on a day other than the day on which the persons were admitted to the facility.(2)However, a private hospital does not include the following—(a)a hospital operated by the State;(b)a nursing home, hostel, or other facility at which accommodation, and nursing or personal care, is provided to persons who, because of infirmity, illness, disease, incapacity or disability, have a permanent need for nursing or personal care.
(1)A day hospital is a facility at which day hospital health services are provided to persons who are admitted to, and discharged from, the facility on the same day, but does not include a facility operated by the State.(2)However, a facility is not a day hospital merely because a day hospital health service is provided to a person at the facility if—(a)the service is provided to the person in an emergency; and(b)it would be unreasonable, having regard to the health and wellbeing of the person, to move the person to another facility to receive the health service.(3)In this section—day hospital health service means any of the following health services—(a)a diagnostic, surgical or other procedure performed by a medical practitioner involving—(i)the administration of a general, spinal or epidural anaesthetic; or(ii)sedation, other than simple sedation;(b)a diagnostic, surgical or other procedure—(i)performed by, or under the direction of, a medical practitioner; and(ii)involving a significant risk that a person on whom the procedure is performed may, because of cardiac, respiratory or other complications arising from the performance of the procedure, require resuscitation; and(iii)prescribed under a regulation.simple sedation means the administration of one or more drugs to a person, that depress the person’s central nervous system, to allow a procedure to be performed on the person by a medical practitioner in a way that—(a)allows communication with the person to be maintained while the procedure is being performed; and(b)makes loss of the person’s consciousness unlikely.
11Authority issued jointly to more than 1 person
A reference in this Act to an authority holder, for an authority issued jointly to more than 1 person, is a reference to each of the persons.
12Chief health officer may make standards
(1)The chief health officer may make standards under this Act for the protection of the health and wellbeing of patients receiving health services at private health facilities.(2)Standards may be made about the following—(a)the particular types of health services to which patients at a private health facility must have access (whether or not the services are provided at the facility) when other health services of a particular type are provided at the facility;(b)processes for—(i)evaluating the credentials of medical practitioners providing, or seeking to provide, health services at private health facilities; and(ii)deciding which health services may be provided by the medical practitioners at the facilities;(c)processes for deciding ethical issues;(d)processes for monitoring, evaluating and improving the quality of health services provided at private health facilities;(e)the day to day care and safety of patients, including admission and discharge procedures and patient records;(f)management and staffing arrangements;(g)minimum patient throughput for health services provided at private health facilities and prescribed under a regulation;(h)equipment, fittings and furnishings at private health facilities;(i)infection control;(j)a matter prescribed under a regulation for this subsection.A standard may be made requiring that a licensee of a private health facility licensed to provide major surgical services to patients must also—(a)provide intensive care and coronary care services to the patients at the facility; or(b)arrange for intensive care and coronary care services to be provided to the patients at another facility.(3)A standard has no effect unless the Minister notifies the making of the standard.(4)The notice must state the places where copies of the standard and the provisions of any document applied, adopted or incorporated by the standard are available for inspection, without charge, during normal business hours.(5)The notice is subordinate legislation.(6)In this section—minimum patient throughput means the minimum number of patients required to receive a particular health service during a stated period to maintain the clinical skills of the staff providing the health service.s 12 amd 2003 No. 9s 62
(1)This section applies to the chief health officer in deciding—(a)whether a person who has applied for an authority for a private health facility or a proposed private health facility is a suitable person to hold the authority; or(b)whether a person who holds an authority for a private health facility or a proposed private health facility is a suitable person to continue to hold the authority.(2)The chief health officer may have regard to the following—(a)whether the person—(i)has the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience to operate the facility under a licence in accordance with the standards; or(ii)has, or is able to obtain, the services of other persons with the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience to enable the person to operate the facility under a licence in accordance with the standards;(b)if the person is a corporation, the skills, knowledge and experience of the corporation’s executive officers that are relevant to operating the facility under a licence in accordance with the standards;(c)if the person has been convicted of a prescribed offence, the nature, and circumstances of the commission, of the offence;(d)if the person is a corporation and any of the corporation’s executive officers have been convicted of a prescribed offence, the nature, and circumstances of the commission, of the offence;(e)whether the person held any of the following that was suspended or cancelled—(i)an authority;(ii)a licence under the repealed division;(iii)the equivalent of an authority under a corresponding law;(f)if the person is a corporation, whether any of the corporation’s executive officers held any of the following that was suspended or cancelled—(i)an authority;(ii)a licence under the repealed division;(iii)the equivalent of an authority under a corresponding law;(g)the person’s current financial position and financial background;(h)whether the person has, or is able to obtain, financial resources the chief health officer reasonably considers are required for the financial viability of the operation of, or proposed operation of, the facility under a licence;(i)the suitability of associates of the person, as mentioned in section 14;(j)anything else relevant to the health and wellbeing of persons who are receiving, or may receive, health services at the facility operated, or proposed to be operated, by the person.(3)In this section—prescribed offence means an indictable offence or an offence against this Act, the repealed division or a corresponding law.s 13 amd 2001 No. 78s 183
The chief health officer may also have regard to the matters mentioned in section 13(2) as they apply to an associate of the applicant or authority holder in deciding—(a)for an applicant for an authority—whether the applicant is a suitable person to hold the authority; or(b)for an authority holder—whether the authority holder is a suitable person to continue to hold the authority.
15Investigation of suitability of persons
The chief health officer may investigate an applicant for an authority, an authority holder or an associate of an applicant or authority holder, to help in deciding—(a)for an applicant for an authority—whether the applicant is a suitable person to hold an authority of the kind applied for; or(b)for an authority holder—whether the authority holder is a suitable person to continue to hold the authority.
16Criminal history reports for investigation
(1)The chief health officer, in investigating a person under section 15, may ask the commissioner of the police service for a written report about the person’s criminal history.(2)If asked by the chief health officer, the commissioner of the police service must give the chief health officer a written report about the criminal history of the person, including the criminal history in the commissioner’s possession or to which the commissioner has access.See section 147 (Confidentiality of information) for restrictions on disclosing information in a report under this section.
17Requirements about application for an approval
An application for an approval must—(a)be made to the chief health officer; and(b)be in the approved form; and(c)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
18Further information or documents to support application for an approval
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to an applicant for an approval, require the applicant to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the applicant within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the applicant fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the applicant is taken to have withdrawn the application.
19Decision about application for an approval
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may grant an application for an approval only if the chief health officer is satisfied—(a)the applicant is a suitable person to hold the approval applied for; andSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(b)the proposed facility, and the health services proposed to be provided at the facility, will comply with the relevant standards.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately issue the approval to the applicant.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.See schedule 3 (Dictionary).
20Further consideration of application for an approval
(1)This section applies if the chief health officer considers more time is needed to decide the application because of the complexity of the issues that need to be considered in deciding the application.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time before the final consideration day, give written notice to the applicant that—(a)because of the complexity of the issues, the chief health officer needs more time to decide the application; and(b)the time within which the chief health officer must decide the application is extended to a stated day that is not more than 60 days after the final consideration day.(3)In this section—final consideration day means the later of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receipt of the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 18—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given.
21Application for an approval taken to be refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused to grant the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 18—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if the day for deciding the application is extended under section 20—the extended day;(d)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
(1)An approval must be in the approved form.(2)The approval must state the following particulars—(a)the name of the approval holder;(b)the day of issue of the approval;(c)the term of the approval;(d)details about the proposed private health facility to which the approval relates, including—(i)the location of the proposed facility; and(ii)the type of health services proposed to be provided at the proposed facility;(e)the conditions of the approval.
(1)An approval must be issued on condition that the approval holder must give the chief health officer written notice of a prescribed change within 21 days of the prescribed change.(2)The chief health officer may issue an approval on additional conditions the chief health officer considers necessary or desirable for—(a)the proper operation of the proposed facility under a licence; or(b)the health and wellbeing of patients who may receive health services at the proposed facility.(3)If the chief health officer decides to issue an approval on additional conditions, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.(4)In this section—prescribed change means a change—(a)in a matter disclosed by an approval holder in an application under this Act; and(b)of a kind prescribed under a regulation.
An approval remains in force for the term, not more than 2 years, stated in the approval.
25Extension of term of approval
(1)The chief health officer may, on application by an approval holder, extend the term of the approval by not more than 2 years.(2)Subsection (1) applies whether or not the term of the approval has already been extended under this section.(3)An application for an extension must—(a)be made to the chief health officer; and(b)be in the approved form; and(c)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation; and(d)be made within the period starting 60 days before the approval expires.
26Further information or documents to support application for extension
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to the approval holder, require the approval holder to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)If the approval holder fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the approval holder is taken to have withdrawn the application.
27Decision about application for extension
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied that the approval holder has made reasonable efforts to progress the development of the proposed private health facility, taking into account—(a)the type of health services proposed to be provided at the proposed facility; and(b)the period that would reasonably be required to complete the development of the proposed facility.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately issue another approval for the extended term.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the approval holder an information notice about the decision.
28Approval continues in force while application is considered
(1)If an approval holder applies for an extension under section 25, the approval continues in force from the day that it would, apart from this section, have expired until—(a)if the application is granted—another approval is issued under section 27(3); or(b)if the application is withdrawn—the day the application is withdrawn; or(c)if the application is refused—the day the information notice about the decision is given to the approval holder.(2)Subsection (1) does not apply if the approval is earlier suspended or cancelled.
29Changing approval—chief health officer acting on own initiative
(1)The chief health officer may decide to change—(a)details about the proposed private health facility stated in the approval for the proposed facility, including the type of health services proposed to be provided at the proposed facility; or(b)the conditions of an approval under section 23(2), including by imposing additional conditions.(2)However, subsection (1) applies only if the chief health officer considers it necessary or desirable to make the change—(a)for the proper operation of the proposed facility; or(b)for the health and wellbeing of patients who may receive health services at the proposed facility.(3)Before deciding to change an approval, the chief health officer must first give the approval holder a written notice (a notice of intention) stating the following—(a)the proposed decision;(b)the grounds for the proposed decision;(c)an outline of the facts and circumstances forming the basis for the grounds;(d)an invitation to the approval holder to show within a stated period (the show cause period) why the proposed decision should not be made.(4)The show cause period must be a period ending at least 21 days after the notice of intention is given to the approval holder.(5)The approval holder may make written representations about the proposed decision to the chief health officer in the show cause period.(6)The chief health officer must consider all written representations made in the show cause period by the authority holder before deciding whether or not to change the approval.(7)If, after giving the approval holder a notice of intention and taking into account any written representations made by the approval holder, the chief health officer decides to change the approval, the chief health officer must immediately give the approval holder an information notice about the decision.(8)The change to the approval takes effect on the day the information notice is given to the approval holder.
30Changing approval—application by approval holder
(1)An approval holder may apply to the chief health officer to change—(a)details about the proposed private health facility stated in the approval for the proposed facility, including the type of health services proposed to be provided at the proposed facility; or(b)the conditions of the approval under section 23(2).(2)An application to change an approval must—(a)be in the approved form; and(b)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
31Further information or document to support application to change an approval
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to an approval holder, require the approval holder to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the approval holder within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the approval holder fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the approval holder is taken to have withdrawn the application.
32Decision about application to change an approval
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may decide to grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied—(a)the approval holder is a suitable person to continue to hold the approval; andSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(b)under the changed approval, the proposed facility, and the health services proposed to be provided at the facility, will comply with the relevant standards.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the approval holder a written notice (a change notice) stating the decision.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the approval holder an information notice about the decision.(5)A change to the approval takes effect on the day the change notice is given to the approval holder.
33Further consideration of application to change an approval
(1)This section applies if the chief health officer considers more time is needed to decide the application because of the complexity of the issues that need to be considered in deciding the application.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time before the final consideration day, give written notice to the approval holder that—(a)because of the complexity of the issues, the chief health officer needs more time to decide the application; and(b)the time within which the chief health officer must decide the application is extended to a stated day that is not more than 60 days after the final consideration day.(3)In this section—final consideration day means the later of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after the receipt of the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 31—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given.
34Application to change an approval taken to be refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 31—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if the day for deciding the application is extended under section 33—the extended day;(d)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
35Recording changes to approvals
(1)The approval holder must return the approval to the chief health officer within 7 days of receiving the information notice under section 29(7) or the change notice, unless the approval holder has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
(2)On receiving the approval, the chief health officer must—(a)amend the approval in an appropriate way and return the amended approval to the approval holder; or(b)issue a replacement approval, incorporating the change, to the approval holder.(3)Failure to record the change by amending the approval, or to issue a replacement approval recording the change, does not affect the validity of the change.
36Surviving persons taken to be approval holder
(1)This section applies if—(a)2 or more individuals jointly are the holders of an approval; and(b)1 or more, but not all, of the individuals die.(2)The following persons are taken to hold the approval—(a)if only 1 individual survives—the surviving individual;(b)if more than 1 individual survives—the surviving individuals jointly.
(1)An approval holder may surrender the approval by giving written notice to the chief health officer.(2)The surrender of the approval takes effect—(a)the day the notice is given to the chief health officer; or(b)if a later day is stated in the notice—on the later day.(3)If the approval is surrendered, the person who held the approval must, within 7 days after the surrender takes effect, return the approval to the chief health officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty for subsection (3)—10 penalty units.
(1)An approval holder may apply to the chief health officer to replace the approval if it has been lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged.(2)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(3)The chief health officer must grant the application if the chief health officer is satisfied the approval has been lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged in a way to require its replacement.(4)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must, on payment of the fee prescribed under a regulation, issue another approval to the applicant to replace the lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged approval.(5)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.
39Licences required to operate private health facilities
A person must not operate a private health facility unless the person holds a licence for the facility.Maximum penalty—1000 penalty units.
If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 143, to have also committed the offence.s 39 amd 2013 No. 51s 229sch 1
40Licences not required to operate certain day hospitals
(1)This section applies if—(a)a licensee operates a private hospital at a place under a licence; and(b)another person operates a day hospital at the place; and(c)in the application for the licence, or an application to change the licence, the licensee has asked for the licence to state that this section applies to the operation of the day hospital; and(d)the licence includes the statement.(2)For this Act, apart from this section—(a)the operation of the day hospital is part of the licensee’s operation of the private hospital; and(b)the other person does not operate the day hospital.
41Restriction on application for licence
An application for a licence may only be made by an approval holder.
42Requirements about applications for licences
An application for a licence must—(a)be made to the chief health officer; and(b)be in the approved form; and(c)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
43Further information or documents to support application for a licence
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to an applicant for a licence, require the applicant to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the applicant within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the applicant fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the applicant is taken to have withdrawn the application.
44Decision about application for a licence
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer must grant the application if—(a)the applicant is an approval holder; and(b)the approval and the application apply to the same private health facility; and(c)any conditions on which the approval was issued have been complied with; and(d)for a facility that has never been occupied, a certificate of classification has been issued for the facility; and(e)for a facility to which paragraph (d) does not apply, the facility complies with the building code; and(f)the chief health officer is satisfied that—(i)the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence applied for; andSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(ii)when operational, the facility, and the health services proposed to be provided at the facility, will comply with the relevant standards.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately issue the licence to the applicant.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.
45Further consideration of application for a licence
(1)This section applies if the chief health officer considers more time is needed to decide the application because of the complexity of the issues that need to be considered in deciding the application.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time before the final consideration day, give written notice to the applicant that—(a)because of the complexity of the issues, the chief health officer needs more time to decide the application; and(b)the time within which the chief health officer must decide the application is extended to a stated day that is not more than 60 days after the final consideration day.(3)In this section—final consideration day means the later of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receipt of the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 43—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given.
46Application for licence taken to have been refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 43—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if the day for deciding the application is extended under section 45—the extended day;(d)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
(1)A licence must be in the approved form.(2)A licence must state the following particulars—(a)the name of the licensee;(b)the day of issue of the licence;(c)the term of the licence;(d)details about the private health facility to which the licence relates, including—(i)the location of the facility; and(ii)a description of the premises making up the facility; and(iii)the type of health services to be provided at the facility;(e)the conditions of the licence.Example for paragraph (d)(ii)—
a floor plan of the premises
(1)A licence for a private health facility must be issued on the following conditions—(a)the licensee must give the chief health officer, within 21 days after a prescribed change, written notice of the prescribed change;(b)within 90 days after the day of issue of the licence, the licensee must start a quality assurance program, conducted by a quality assurance entity, for the facility;(c)within 3 years after the day of issue of the licence, the licensee must receive certification from the quality assurance entity that the facility operates under a quality assurance system;(d)after the certification mentioned in paragraph (c) or subsection (2) is received, the facility must continue to be certified under the program as a facility that operates under a quality assurance system;(e)the licensee must comply with the standards relevant to the facility;(f)the licensee must operate the facility in accordance with the details about the facility stated in the licence, including providing at the facility only the type of health services stated in the licence;(g)the licensee must ensure the premises making up the facility and all equipment, fittings and furnishings in the facility are kept in good repair and operational order;(h)the licensee must not make a prescribed alteration to the facility without the approval of the chief health officer under section 65.(2)Subsection (1)(b) and (c) do not apply if, when the licence is issued, the licensee has received certification from a quality assurance entity that the facility operates under a quality assurance system.(3)Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if, when the licence is issued, the licensee has started, but not finished, a quality assurance program for the facility.(4)The chief health officer may issue a licence on additional conditions the chief health officer considers necessary or desirable for—(a)the proper operation of the facility; or(b)the health and wellbeing of patients who may receive health services at the facility.(5)If the chief health officer decides under subsection (4) to issue a licence on additional conditions, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.(6)In this section—prescribed change means a change—(a)in a matter disclosed by the licensee in an application under this Act; and(b)of a kind prescribed under a regulation.
(1)A licensee must not contravene a condition of the licence.Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.
(2)To remove doubt, it is declared that the penalty under subsection (1) may be imposed whether or not the licence is cancelled or suspended because of the contravention.
(1)A licence remains in force for the term stated in the licence.(2)The stated term must not exceed—(a)if the private health facility to which the licence relates has been certified as operating under a quality assurance system—3 years; or(b)otherwise—1 year.
(1)The chief health officer may, on application by a licensee, renew the licence.(2)An application for renewal must—(a)be in the approved form; and(b)be made within the period starting 60 days before the licence expires; and(c)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
52Further information or document to support application for renewal
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to the licensee, require the licensee to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)If the licensee fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the licensee is taken to have withdrawn the application.
53Decision about application for renewal
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied—(a)the licensee is a suitable person to continue to hold the licence; andSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(b)the private health facility to which the licence relates, and the health services provided at the facility, comply with the relevant standards.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately issue a new licence to the licensee.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the licensee an information notice about the decision.
54Licence continues in force while application is considered
(1)If a licensee applies for a renewal under section 51, the licence continues in force from the day that it would, apart from this section, have expired until—(a)if the application is granted—the new licence is issued to the licensee under section 53(3); or(b)if the application is withdrawn—the day the application is withdrawn; or(c)if the application is refused—the day the information notice about the decision is given to the licensee.(2)Subsection (1) does not apply if the licence is earlier suspended or cancelled.
55Changing licence—chief health officer acting on own initiative
(1)The chief health officer may decide to change—(a)details about the private health facility stated in the licence for the facility, including the type of health services provided at the facility; or(b)the conditions of a licence under section 48(4), including by imposing additional conditions.(2)However, subsection (1) applies only if the chief health officer considers it necessary or desirable to make the change—(a)for the proper operation of the private health facility to which the licence relates; or(b)for the health and wellbeing of patients who are receiving, or may receive, health services at the facility.(3)Before deciding to change the licence, the chief health officer must first give the licensee a written notice (a notice of intention) stating the following—(a)the proposed decision;(b)the grounds for the proposed decision;(c)an outline of the facts and circumstances forming the basis for the grounds;(d)an invitation to the licensee to show within a stated period (the show cause period) why the proposed decision should not be made.(4)The show cause period must be a period ending at least 21 days after the notice of intention is given to the licensee.(5)The licensee may make written representations about the proposed decision to the chief health officer in the show cause period.(6)The chief health officer must consider all written representations made in the show cause period by the licensee before deciding whether or not to change the licence.(7)If, after giving the licensee a notice of intention and taking into account any written representations made by the licensee, the chief health officer decides to change the licence, the chief health officer must immediately give the licensee an information notice about the decision.(8)The change to the licence takes effect on the day the information notice is given to the licensee.
56Licensee may apply to change a licence
(1)A licensee may apply to the chief health officer to change—(a)details about the private health facility stated in the licence for the facility, including the type of health services provided at the facility; or(b)the conditions of the licence under section 48(4).(2)An application to change a licence must—(a)be in the approved form; and(b)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
57Further information or document to support application to change a licence
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to the licensee, require the licensee to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the licensee within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the licensee fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the licensee is taken to have withdrawn the application.
58Decision whether to change licence
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may decide to grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied—(a)the licensee is a suitable person to continue to hold the licence; andSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(b)under the changed licence, the facility, and the provision of health services at the facility, will comply with the relevant standards.(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the licensee a written notice (a change notice) stating the decision.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the licensee an information notice about the decision.(5)A change to the licence takes effect on the day the change notice is given to the licensee.
59Further consideration of application to change a licence
(1)This section applies if the chief health officer considers more time is needed to decide the application because of the complexity of the issues that need to be considered in deciding the application.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time before the final consideration day, give written notice to the licensee that—(a)because of the complexity of the issues, the chief health officer needs more time to decide the application; and(b)the time within which the chief health officer must decide the application is extended to a stated day that is not more than 60 days after the final consideration day.(3)In this section—final consideration day means the later of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after the receipt of the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 57—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given.
60Application to change a licence taken to be refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused to grant the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 57—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if the day for deciding the application is extended under section 59—the extended day;(d)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
(1)The licensee must return the licence to the chief health officer within 7 days of receiving the information notice under section 55(7) or the change notice, unless the licensee has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
(2)On receiving the licence, the chief health officer must—(a)amend the licence in an appropriate way and return the amended licence to the licensee; or(b)issue a replacement licence, incorporating the change, to the licensee.(3)Failure to record the change by amending the licence, or to issue a replacement licence recording the change, does not affect the validity of the change.
62Meaning of prescribed alteration
(1)A prescribed alteration, to a private health facility, is—(a)a change in the purpose for which part of the facility is used; or(b)a change made to the physical structure of the facility.a waiting room is converted to an operating theatre(2)However, a prescribed alteration does not include a change to the facility for which a development permit under the Planning Act 2016 is required.s 62 amd 2009 No. 36s 872sch 2; 2016 No. 27s 356
63Requirements about applications for approval of prescribed alterations
An application for approval of a prescribed alteration must—(a)be made to the chief health officer; and(b)be in the approved form; and(c)be accompanied by the fee prescribed under a regulation.
64Further information or document to support applications for approval of prescribed alterations
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice to a licensee, require the licensee to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the licensee within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the licensee fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the licensee is taken to have withdrawn the application.
65Decision about applications for approval of prescribed alterations
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied that, after making the prescribed alteration, the facility, and the provision of health services at the facility, will comply with the relevant standards.(3)The chief health officer may grant the application on the condition in paragraph (a) or both of the following conditions—(a)the licensee must give the chief health officer written notice of having made the prescribed alteration immediately after making the prescribed alteration;(b)the licensee must not provide health services in the part of the facility affected by the prescribed alteration—(i)unless the prescribed alteration has been made as specified in the application; and(ii)until the earlier of the following days—(A)the day the chief health officer or an authorised person inspects the part of the facility affected by the prescribed alteration;(B)the day that is 14 days after the notice under paragraph (a) is given.(4)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the licensee a written notice stating the decision.(5)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.(6)If the chief health officer grants the application on a condition mentioned in subsection (3), the licensee must not contravene the condition.Maximum penalty for subsection (6)—50 penalty units.
66Application for approval of a prescribed alteration taken to be refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 64—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
A licensee may transfer the licence only if the chief health officer grants an application to transfer the licence.
68Requirements about transfer applications
(1)An application to transfer a licence may be made only by the proposed transferee of the licence.(2)The application must—(a)be made to the chief health officer; and(b)be in the approved form; and(c)be accompanied by—(i)a written consent in the approved form signed by the licensee; and(ii)the fee prescribed under a regulation.
69Further information or documents to support transfer application
(1)The chief health officer may, by written notice given to an applicant to transfer a licence, require the applicant to give the chief health officer, within the reasonable time stated in the notice (but not less than 30 days), further information or a document about the application.(2)The information mentioned in subsection (1) must, if the notice requires, be verified by a statutory declaration.(3)The requirement may only relate to information or a document that is necessary and reasonable to help the chief health officer decide the application.(4)A notice under subsection (1) must be given to the applicant within 60 days after the chief health officer receives the application.(5)If the applicant fails to comply with the requirement within the stated time, the applicant is taken to have withdrawn the application.
70Decision about transfer application
(1)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(2)The chief health officer may grant the application only if the chief health officer is satisfied the proposed transferee is a suitable person to hold the licence.See part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(3)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must give the transferee and the licensee written notice (a transfer notice) stating the decision.(4)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must give the proposed transferee and the licensee an information notice about the decision.(5)A transfer of a licence—(a)takes effect on the day the transfer notice for the licence is given to the transferee; or(b)if a later day of effect is stated in the notice—on the later day.
71Further consideration of application to transfer a licence
(1)This section applies if the chief health officer considers more time is needed to decide the application because of the complexity of the issues that need to be considered in deciding the application.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time before the final consideration day, give written notice to the applicant that—(a)because of the complexity of the issues, the chief health officer needs more time to decide the application; and(b)the time within which the chief health officer must decide the application is extended to a stated day that is not more than 60 days after the final consideration day.(3)In this section—final consideration day means the later of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receipt of the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 69—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given.
72Application to transfer a licence taken to be refused in certain circumstances
The chief health officer is taken to have refused the application if the chief health officer has not decided the application by the latest of the following days—(a)the day that is 60 days after receiving the application;(b)if further information or a document is required by a notice given under section 69—the day that is 60 days after the information or document is given;(c)if the day for deciding the application is extended under section 71—the extended day;(d)if another day for deciding the application is agreed to by the applicant and the chief health officer—the agreed day.
73Recording transfer of licence
(1)A licensee must return the licence to the chief health officer within 7 days of receiving a transfer notice, unless the licensee has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
(2)On receiving the licence, the chief health officer must—(a)amend the licence in an appropriate way and give the amended licence to the transferee; or(b)issue a replacement licence in the name of the transferee.(3)Failure to record a transfer by amending the licence, or to issue a replacement licence in the name of the transferee, does not affect the validity of the transfer.
An instrument or document purporting to encumber a licence is of no effect.
(1)This section applies if only 1 individual is the licensee of a licence.(2)If the licensee dies, the personal representative of the licensee’s estate is taken to be the licensee for—(a)6 months from the day of the licensee’s death; or(b)a longer period the chief health officer decides, on written application made by the personal representative.(3)The chief health officer may act under subsection (2)(b) only if—(a)the chief health officer has received written notice from the personal representative that a person intends to apply to transfer the licence; and(b)the chief health officer reasonably believes that it is appropriate to extend the period for which the personal representative is taken to be the licensee to enable an application to transfer the licence to be made and decided.(4)Also, subsection (2) applies subject to any transfer, suspension, cancellation, surrender or expiry of the licence under this Act.
76Surviving persons taken to be licensee
(1)This section applies if—(a)2 or more individuals jointly are the licensee of a licence; and(b)1 or more, but not all, of the individuals die.(2)The following persons are taken to hold the licence—(a)if only 1 individual survives—the surviving individual;(b)if more than 1 individual survives—the surviving individuals jointly.
(1)A licensee may surrender a licence by giving the chief health officer written notice of the surrender.(2)The surrender of the licence takes effect—(a)30 days after the day the notice is given to the chief health officer; or(b)if a later day of effect is stated in the notice—on the later day.(3)If the licence is surrendered, the person who held the licence must, within 7 days after the surrender takes effect, return the licence to the chief health officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty for subsection (3)—10 penalty units.
78Surrender before operation of facility stops
A licensee must not stop operating a private health facility unless the licensee has surrendered the licence and the surrender of the licence has taken effect, unless the licensee has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(1)A licensee may apply to the chief health officer to replace the licence if it has been lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged.(2)The chief health officer must consider the application and either grant or refuse the application.(3)The chief health officer must grant the application if the chief health officer is satisfied the licence has been lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged in a way to require its replacement.(4)If the chief health officer decides to grant the application, the chief health officer must, on payment of the fee prescribed under a regulation, issue another licence to the applicant to replace the lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged licence.(5)If the chief health officer decides to refuse the application, the chief health officer must immediately give the applicant an information notice about the decision.
80Grounds for suspension or cancellation
(1)A ground for suspending or cancelling an authority exists if the authority holder—(a)is not a suitable person to continue to hold an authority of that kind; orSee part 4 (Suitability of persons to be authority holders).(b)contravenes a provision of this Act or a condition of the authority in a way that may result in the health and wellbeing of a patient being affected in an adverse and material way; or(c)is affected by bankruptcy action, or by control action under the Corporations Act.(2)Also, a ground for suspending or cancelling an authority exists if the authority was issued because of a materially false or misleading representation or declaration.(3)For subsection (1)(c), an authority holder is affected by bankruptcy action if the authority holder—(a)is bankrupt; or(b)has compounded with creditors; or(c)as a debtor, has otherwise taken, or applied to take, advantage of any law about bankruptcy.(4)For subsection (1)(c), an authority holder is affected by control action under the Corporations Act if the authority holder—(a)has executed a deed of company arrangement under that Act; or(b)is the subject of a winding-up (whether voluntarily or under a court order) under that Act; or(c)is the subject of an appointment of an administrator, liquidator, receiver or receiver and manager under that Act.s 80 amd 2001 No. 45s 29sch 3; 2001 No. 78s 184
(1)This section applies if—(a)the chief health officer believes a ground exists to suspend or cancel an authority; and(b)the chief health officer—(i)has not given, and does not propose to give, the authority holder a compliance notice under section 125(2) to rectify a matter to which the ground relates; or(ii)has given the authority holder a compliance notice under section 125(2) to rectify a matter to which the ground relates and the authority holder—(A)fails to comply with the compliance notice within the period stated in the notice; and(B)does not have a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the notice.(2)The chief health officer must give the authority holder a written notice (a show cause notice) stating the following—(a)the action (the proposed action) the chief health officer proposes taking under this part;(b)the grounds for the proposed action;(c)an outline of the facts and circumstances forming the basis for the grounds;(d)if the proposed action is suspension of the authority, the proposed suspension period;(e)an invitation to the authority holder to show within a stated period (the show cause period) why the proposed action should not be taken.(3)The show cause period must be a period ending at least 21 days after the show cause notice is given to the authority holder.(4)The authority holder may make written representations about the proposed action to the chief health officer in the show cause period.s 81 amd 2001 No. 78s 185
82Consideration of representations
The chief health officer must consider all written representations (the accepted representations) made in the show cause period by the authority holder.
83Ending show cause process without further action
(1)This section applies if, after considering the accepted representations for the show cause notice, the chief health officer no longer believes a ground exists to suspend or cancel the authority.(2)The chief health officer must not take further action about the show cause notice.(3)The chief health officer must, immediately after making the decision, give the authority holder written notice that no further action about the show cause notice is to be taken.
84Suspension and cancellation of authorities
(1)This section applies if after considering the accepted representations for the show cause notice, the chief health officer—(a)still believes a ground exists to suspend or cancel the authority; and(b)believes suspension or cancellation of the authority is warranted.(2)This section also applies if there are no accepted representations for the show cause notice.(3)The chief health officer may—(a)if the proposed action stated in the show cause notice was to suspend the authority for a stated period—suspend the authority for not longer than the stated period; or(b)if the proposed action stated in the show cause notice was to cancel the authority—either cancel the authority or suspend it for a period.(4)The chief health officer must immediately give an information notice about the decision to the authority holder.(5)The decision takes effect—(a)on the day the information notice is given to the authority holder; or(b)if a later day is stated in the notice—on the later day.(6)If the authority is cancelled or suspended, the person who held the authority must, within 7 days after receiving the information notice, return the authority to the chief health officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
(7)The chief health officer must, immediately after the suspension stops operating, give to the authority holder the authority that was returned to the chief health officer under subsection (6).
85Immediate suspension of licence
(1)The chief health officer may suspend a licence immediately if the chief health officer believes—(a)a ground exists to suspend or cancel the licence; and(b)the circumstances are of a nature that it is imperative to suspend the licence immediately to ensure the health and wellbeing of patients are not affected in an adverse and material way.(2)The suspension—(a)must be effected by an information notice given to the licensee with a show cause notice; and(b)operates immediately the notices are given; and(c)continues to operate until the earliest of the following occurs—(i)the chief health officer cancels the remaining period of the suspension;(ii)the show cause notice is finally dealt with;(iii)60 days have passed since the notices were given to the licensee.(3)If the licence is suspended, the person who held the licence must, within 7 days after receiving the notices, return the licence to the chief health officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
(4)The chief health officer must, immediately after the suspension stops operating, give to the licensee the licence that was returned to the chief health officer under subsection (3).
86Cancellation or reduction of period of suspension of authority
(1)At any time a suspension of an authority is in force, the chief health officer may, for any reason the chief health officer considers appropriate—(a)cancel the remaining period of the suspension; or(b)reduce the remaining period of the suspension.(2)The chief health officer must immediately give to the authority holder—(a)written notice of the decision; and(b)the authority that was returned by the authority holder to the chief health officer under section 84(6).
87Appointment and qualifications
(1)The chief health officer may appoint a person as an authorised person.(2)The chief health officer may appoint a person as an authorised person only if the chief health officer considers the person has the necessary expertise or experience to be an authorised person.s 87 amd 2001 No. 78s 186
(1)An authorised person has the functions of conducting investigations and inspections to monitor and enforce compliance with this Act.(2)An authorised person has the powers given under this or another Act.(3)An authorised person is subject to the directions of the chief health officer in exercising the powers.(4)An authorised person’s powers may be limited—(a)under a condition of appointment; or(b)by written notice given by the chief health officer to the authorised person.
(1)An authorised person holds office on the conditions stated in the instrument of appointment.(2)An authorised person ceases holding office—(a)if the appointment provides for a term of appointment—at the end of the term; or(b)if the conditions of appointment provide—on ceasing to hold another office (the main office) stated in the appointment conditions.(3)An authorised person may resign by signed notice of resignation given to the chief health officer.(4)However, an authorised person may not resign from the office of authorised person (the secondary office) if a term of the authorised person’s employment to the main office requires the authorised person to hold the secondary office.
(1)The chief health officer must give each authorised person an identity card.(2)The identity card must—(a)contain a recent photograph of the authorised person; and(b)be signed by the authorised person; and(c)include an expiry date; and(d)identify the person as an authorised person under this Act.
91Failure to return identity card
A person who ceases to be an authorised person must return the person’s identity card to the chief health officer within 7 days after ceasing to be an authorised person, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—10 penalty units.
92Production or display of identity card
(1)An authorised person may exercise a power in relation to someone else (the other person) only if the authorised person—(a)first produces the authorised person’s identity card for the other person’s inspection; or(b)has the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the other person.(2)However, if for any reason it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1) before exercising the power, the authorised person must produce the identity card for the other person’s inspection at the first reasonable opportunity.
(1)An authorised person may enter a place if—(a)its occupier consents to the entry; or(b)it is a public place and the entry is made when it is open to the public; or(c)the entry is authorised by a warrant; or(d)it is a private health facility to which a licence relates and the entry is made when the facility is open for business or otherwise open for entry.(2)For the purpose of asking the occupier of a place for consent to enter, an authorised person may, without the occupier’s consent or a warrant—(a)enter land around premises at the place to an extent that is reasonable to contact the occupier; or(b)enter part of the place the authorised person reasonably considers members of the public ordinarily are allowed to enter when they wish to contact the occupier.(3)In subsection (1)(d)—when the facility is open for business includes when health services are being provided at the facility.
(1)This section applies if an authorised person intends to ask an occupier of a place to consent to the authorised person or another authorised person entering the place under section 93(1)(a).(2)Before asking for the consent, the authorised person must tell the occupier—(a)the purpose of the entry; and(b)that the occupier is not required to consent.(3)If the consent is given, the authorised person may ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement of the consent.(4)The acknowledgement must state—(a)the occupier has been told—(i)the purpose of the entry; and(ii)that the occupier is not required to consent; and(b)the purpose of the entry; and(c)the occupier gives the authorised person consent to enter the place and exercise powers under this division; and(d)the time and date the consent was given.(5)If the occupier signs the acknowledgement, the authorised person must immediately give a copy to the occupier.(6)A court must find the occupier of a place did not consent to an authorised person entering the place under this division if—(a)an issue arises in a proceeding before the court whether the occupier of the place consented to the entry under section 93(1)(a); and(b)an acknowledgement mentioned in subsection (4) is not produced in evidence for the entry; and(c)it is not proved by the person relying on the lawfulness of the entry that the occupier consented to the entry.
(1)An authorised officer may apply to a magistrate for a warrant for a place.(2)The application must be sworn and state the grounds on which the warrant is sought.(3)The magistrate may refuse to consider the application until the authorised person gives the magistrate all the information the magistrate requires about the application in the way the magistrate requires.The magistrate may require additional information supporting the application to be given by statutory declaration.
(1)The magistrate may issue a warrant only if the magistrate is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting—(a)there is a particular thing or activity (the evidence) that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act; and(b)the evidence is at the place, or, within the next 7 days, may be at the place.(2)The warrant must state—(a)that a stated authorised person may, with necessary and reasonable help and force—(i)enter the place and any other place necessary for the entry; and(ii)exercise the authorised person’s powers under this division; and(b)the offence for which the warrant is sought; and(c)the evidence that may be seized under the warrant; and(d)the hours of the day or night when the place may be entered; and(e)the date, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.
(1)An authorised person may apply for a warrant (a special warrant) by phone, fax, radio or another form of communication if the authorised person considers it necessary because of—(a)urgent circumstances; or(b)other special circumstances, including, for example, the authorised person’s remote location.(2)Before applying for the special warrant, the authorised person must prepare an application stating the grounds on which the warrant is sought.(3)The authorised person may apply for the special warrant before the application is sworn.(4)After issuing the special warrant, the magistrate must promptly fax a copy (a facsimile warrant) to the authorised person if it is reasonably practicable to fax the copy.(5)If it is not reasonably practicable to fax a copy to the authorised person—(a)the magistrate must tell the authorised person—(i)what the terms of the special warrant are; and(ii)the date and time the special warrant is issued; and(b)the authorised person must complete a form of warrant (a warrant form) and write on it—(i)the magistrate’s name; and(ii)the date and time the magistrate issued the special warrant; and(iii)the terms of the special warrant.(6)The facsimile warrant, or the warrant form properly completed by the authorised person, authorises the entry and the exercise of the other powers stated in the special warrant issued.(7)The authorised person must, at the first reasonable opportunity, send to the magistrate—(a)the sworn application; and(b)if the authorised person completed a warrant form—the completed warrant form.(8)On receiving the documents, the magistrate must attach them to the special warrant.(9)A court must find the exercise of the power by an authorised person was not authorised by a special warrant if—(a)an issue arises in a proceeding before the court whether the exercise of the power was authorised by a special warrant mentioned in subsection (1); and(b)the special warrant is not produced in evidence; and(c)it is not proved by the person relying on the lawfulness of the entry that the authorised person obtained the special warrant.
98Warrants—procedure before entry
(1)This section applies if an authorised person named in a warrant issued under this division for a place is intending to enter the place under the warrant.(2)Before entering the place, the authorised person must do or make a reasonable attempt to do the following things—(a)identify himself or herself to a person present at the place who is an occupier of the place by producing the authorised person’s identity card or a copy of another document evidencing the authorised person’s appointment;(b)give the person a copy of the warrant or, if the entry is authorised by a facsimile warrant or warrant form mentioned in section 97(6), a copy of the facsimile warrant or warrant form;(c)tell the person the authorised person is permitted by the warrant to enter the place;(d)give the person an opportunity to allow the authorised person immediate entry to the place without using force.(3)However, the authorised person need not comply with subsection (2) if the authorised person believes on reasonable grounds that immediate entry to the place is required to ensure the effective execution of the warrant is not frustrated.
99General powers after entering places
(1)This section applies to an authorised person who enters a place.(2)However, if an authorised person enters a place to get the occupier’s consent to enter the place, this section applies to the authorised person only if the consent is given or the entry is otherwise authorised.(3)For monitoring or enforcing compliance with this Act, the authorised person may—(a)search any part of the place; or(b)inspect, measure, test, photograph or film any part of the place or anything at the place; or(c)take a thing, or a sample of or from a thing, at the place for analysis or testing; or(d)copy a document at the place; or(e)take into or onto the place any person, equipment and materials the authorised person reasonably requires for the exercise of a power under this division; or(f)require the occupier of the place, or a person at the place, to give the authorised person reasonable help to exercise the authorised person’s powers under paragraphs (a) to (e); or(g)require the occupier of a place, or a person at the place, to give the authorised person information to help the authorised person ascertain whether the Act is being complied with.(4)When making a requirement mentioned in subsection (3)(f) or (g), the authorised person must warn the person it is an offence to fail to comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
When entering a place to exercise powers for monitoring or enforcing compliance with this Act, an authorised person must not do anything that may adversely affect the health or physical privacy of a person in the place.Example of how a person’s physical privacy may be adversely affected—
entering a room while a person is being examined by a medical practitioner
101Failure to help authorised person
(1)A person required to give reasonable help under section 99(3)(f) must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)If the requirement is to be complied with by an individual giving information, or producing a document, it is a reasonable excuse for the individual not to comply with the requirement that complying with the requirement may tend to incriminate the individual.
102Failure to give information
(1)A person of whom a requirement is made under section 99(3)(g) must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)It is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to comply with the requirement that complying with the requirement may tend to incriminate the individual.
103Seizing evidence at a place that may be entered without consent or warrant
An authorised person who enters a place that may be entered under this division without the consent of the occupier and without a warrant, may seize a thing at the place if the authorised person reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act.
104Seizing evidence at place that may only be entered with consent or warrant
(1)This section applies if—(a)an authorised person is authorised to enter a place under this division only with the consent of the occupier or a warrant; and(b)the authorised person enters the place after obtaining the necessary consent or warrant.(2)If the authorised person enters the place with the occupier’s consent, the authorised person may seize a thing at the place if—(a)the authorised person reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and(b)seizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as told to the occupier when asking for the occupier’s consent.(3)If the authorised person enters the place with a warrant, the authorised person may seize the evidence for which the warrant was issued.(4)The authorised person may seize anything else at the place if the authorised person reasonably believes—(a)the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and(b)the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being—(i)hidden, lost or destroyed; or(ii)used to continue, or repeat, the offence.(5)Also, the authorised person may seize a thing at the place if the authorised person reasonably believes it has just been used in committing an offence against this Act.
Having seized a thing, an authorised person may—(a)move the thing from the place where it was seized (the place of seizure); or(b)leave the thing at the place of seizure but take reasonable action to restrict access to it; or(c)if the thing is equipment—make it inoperable.Examples of restricting access to a thing—
1sealing a thing and marking it to show access to it is restricted2sealing the entrance to a room where the thing is situated and marking it to show access to it is restrictedExample of making equipment inoperable—
dismantling equipment or removing a component of equipment without which the equipment is not capable of being used
106Tampering with seized things
(1)If an authorised person restricts access to a seized thing, a person must not tamper, or attempt to tamper, with the thing, or something restricting access to the thing, without an authorised person’s approval.Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
(2)If an authorised person makes seized equipment inoperable, a person must not tamper, or attempt to tamper, with the equipment, without an authorised person’s approval.Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
s 106 amd 2001 No. 78s 187
(1)To enable a thing to be seized, an authorised person may require the person in control of it—(a)to take it to a stated reasonable place by a stated reasonable time; and(b)if necessary, to remain in control of it at the stated place for a stated reasonable period.(2)The requirement—(a)must be made by notice in the approved form; or(b)if for any reason it is not practicable to give the notice, may be made orally and confirmed by a notice in the approved form as soon as practicable.(3)A further requirement may be made under this section about the thing if it is necessary and reasonable to make the further requirement.(4)A person of whom a requirement is made under subsection (1) or (3) must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty for subsection (4)—50 penalty units.
(1)As soon as practicable after an authorised person seizes a thing, the authorised person must give a receipt for it to the person from whom it was seized.(2)However, if for any reason it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1), the authorised person must leave the receipt at the place of seizure in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.(3)The receipt must describe generally each thing seized and its condition.(4)This section does not apply to a thing if it is impracticable, or would be unreasonable, to give the receipt (given the thing’s nature, condition and value).
109Forfeiture by authorised person
(1)A thing that has been seized under this subdivision is forfeited to the State if the authorised person who seized the thing—(a)can not find its owner, after making reasonable inquiries; or(b)can not return it to its owner, after making reasonable efforts; or(c)reasonably believes it is necessary to keep the thing to prevent it being used to commit an offence against this Act.(2)In applying subsection (1)—(a)subsection (1)(a) does not require the authorised person to make inquiries if it would be unreasonable to make inquiries to find the owner; and(b)subsection (1)(b) does not require the authorised person to make efforts if it would be unreasonable to make efforts to return the thing to its owner.the owner of the thing has migrated to another country(3)If the authorised person makes a decision under subsection (1)(c) resulting in the seized thing being forfeited to the State, the authorised person must immediately give the owner an information notice about the decision.(4)Subsection (3) does not apply if—(a)the authorised person can not find the owner, after making reasonable inquiries; or(b)it is impracticable or would be unreasonable to give the information notice.(5)Regard must be had to a thing’s nature, condition and value—(a)in deciding—(i)whether it is reasonable to make inquiries or efforts; and(ii)if making inquiries or efforts—what inquiries or efforts, including the period over which they are made, are reasonable; or(b)in deciding whether it would be unreasonable to give the information notice.
(1)On conviction of a person for an offence against this Act, the court may order the forfeiture to the State of anything owned by the person and seized under this subdivision.(2)The court may make any order to enforce the forfeiture it considers appropriate.(3)This section does not limit the court’s powers under the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another law.
111Dealing with forfeited things
(1)On forfeiture of a thing to the State, the thing becomes the State’s property and may be dealt with by the chief health officer as the chief health officer considers appropriate.(2)Without limiting subsection (1), the chief health officer may destroy or dispose of the thing.(3)Despite subsection (1), the chief health officer must not deal with the thing in a way that could prejudice the outcome of a review applied for under part 9.s 111 amd 2009 No. 24s 1204
(1)If a seized thing is not forfeited, the authorised person must return it to its owner—(a)at the end of 6 months; or(b)if a proceeding for an offence involving the thing is started within 6 months—at the end of the proceeding and any appeal from the proceeding.(2)Despite subsection (1), unless the thing is forfeited, the authorised person must immediately return a thing seized as evidence to its owner if the authorised person stops being satisfied its continued retention as evidence is necessary.
(1)Until a seized thing is forfeited or returned, an authorised person must allow its owner to inspect it and, if it is a document, to copy it.(2)Subsection (1) does not apply if it is impracticable, or would be unreasonable, to allow the inspection or copying.
114Power to require name and address
(1)This section applies if—(a)an authorised person finds a person committing an offence against this Act; or(b)an authorised person finds a person in circumstances that lead, or has information that leads, the authorised person to reasonably suspect the person has just committed an offence against this Act.(2)The authorised person may require the person to state the person’s name and residential address.(3)When making the requirement, the authorised person must warn the person it is an offence to fail to state the person’s name or residential address, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.(4)The authorised person may require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the stated name or residential address if the authorised person reasonably suspects the stated name or address to be false.
115Failure to give name or address
(1)A person of whom a requirement under section 114 is made must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)A person does not commit an offence against subsection (1) if—(a)the person was required to state the person’s name and residential address by an authorised person who suspected the person had committed an offence against this Act; and(b)the person is not proved to have committed the offence.
116Power to require production of documents
(1)An authorised person may require a person to make available for inspection by an authorised person, or produce to the authorised person for inspection, at a reasonable time and place nominated by the authorised person—(a)a document issued to the person under this Act; or(b)a document required to be kept by the person under this Act.(2)The authorised person may keep the document to copy it.(3)If the authorised person copies a document mentioned in subsection (1)(b), or an entry in the document, the authorised person may require the person responsible for keeping the document to certify the copy as a true copy of the document or entry.(4)The authorised person must return the document to the person as soon as practicable after copying it.(5)However, if a requirement (a document certification requirement) is made of a person under subsection (3), the authorised person may keep the document until the person complies with the requirement.(6)A requirement under subsection (1) is called a document production requirement.
117Failure to certify copy of document
A person of whom a document certification requirement is made must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
118Failure to produce document
(1)A person of whom a document production requirement is made must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)It is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to comply with a document production requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the individual.
119Power to require information
(1)This section applies if an authorised person reasonably believes—(a)an offence against this Act has been committed; and(b)a person may be able to give information about the offence.(2)The authorised person may, by written notice given to the person, require the person to give information about the offence to the authorised officer at a stated reasonable place and at a stated reasonable time.(3)The person must comply with a requirement under subsection (2), unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(4)It is a reasonable excuse for an individual to fail to give information if giving the information might tend to incriminate the individual.
(1)This section applies if—(a)an authorised person damages property when exercising or purporting to exercise a power; or(b)a person (the other person) acting under the direction or authority of an authorised person damages property.(2)The authorised person must immediately give written notice of particulars of the damage to the person who appears to the authorised person to be the owner of the property.(3)If the authorised person believes the damage was caused by a latent defect in the property or circumstances beyond the authorised person’s, or other person’s, control, the authorised person may state the belief in the notice.(4)If, for any reason, it is impracticable to comply with subsection (2), the authorised person must leave the notice in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way where the damage happened.(5)This section does not apply to damage the authorised person reasonably believes is trivial.(6)In this section—owner, of property, includes the person in possession or control of it.
(1)A person may claim compensation from the State if the person incurs loss or expense because of the exercise or purported exercise of a power under any of the following—•subdivision 1•subdivision 3•subdivision 4.(2)Without limiting subsection (1), compensation may be claimed for loss or expense incurred in complying with a requirement made of the person under the subdivision.(3)Compensation may be claimed and ordered to be paid in a proceeding—(a)brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of the amount of compensation claimed; or(b)for an offence against this Act brought against the person claiming compensation.(4)A court may order compensation to be paid only if it is satisfied it is just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.
122False or misleading statements
(1)A person must not state anything to an authorised person that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1), it is enough to state that the statement made was, without specifying which, false or misleading.
123False or misleading documents
(1)A person must not give an authorised person a document containing information that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)Subsection (1) does not apply to a person if the person, when giving the document—(a)tells the authorised person, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and(b)if the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information—gives the correct information.(3)In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1), it is enough to state that the document was, without specifying which, false or misleading.
124Obstructing and impersonating authorised persons
(1)A person must not obstruct an authorised person in the exercise of a power, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
(2)If a person has obstructed an authorised person and the authorised person decides to proceed with the exercise of the power, the authorised person must warn the person that—(a)it is an offence to obstruct the authorised person, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and(b)the authorised person considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.(3)A person must not pretend to be an authorised person.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(4)In this section—obstruct includes hinder and attempt to obstruct or hinder.
(1)This section applies if—(a)the chief health officer or an authorised person reasonably believes—(i)an authority holder—(A)is contravening a provision of this Act; or(B)has contravened a provision of this Act in circumstances that make it likely the contravention will continue or be repeated; and(ii)a matter relating to the contravention is reasonably capable of being rectified; and(iii)it is appropriate to give the authority holder an opportunity to rectify the matter; and(b)if the matter relates to a ground to suspend or cancel the authority, the chief health officer has not given a show cause notice to the authority holder under section 81.(2)The chief health officer or authorised person may give the authority holder a written notice (a compliance notice) requiring the authority holder to rectify the matter.(3)The compliance notice must state—(a)that the chief health officer or authorised person believes the authority holder—(i)is contravening a provision of this Act; or(ii)has contravened a provision of this Act in circumstances that make it likely that the contravention will continue or be repeated; and(b)the provision the chief health officer or authorised person believes is being, or has been, contravened; and(c)briefly, how it is believed the provision is being, or has been contravened; and(d)the matter relating to the contravention that the chief health officer or authorised person believes is reasonably capable of being rectified; and(e)the reasonable steps the authority holder must take to rectify the matter; and(f)that the authority holder must take the steps within a stated reasonable period.(4)The authority holder must comply with the compliance notice, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
(5)The authority holder can not be prosecuted for contravention of the provision unless the authority holder—(a)fails to comply with the compliance notice within the stated period; and(b)does not have a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the notice.s 125 amd 2001 No. 78s 188
pt hdg amd 2009 No. 24s 1205
div hdg sub 2009 No. 24s 1206
126Review process starts with internal review
Every review of an original decision must be, in the first instance, by way of an application for internal review.s 126 amd 2009 No. 24s 1207
(1)A person who is given, or is entitled to be given, an information notice for a decision (the original decision) and who is dissatisfied with the decision may apply to the chief health officer for a review (an internal review) of the decision.(2)To help users of this Act, schedule 1 identifies the decisions for which an information notice must be given under this Act.
(1)The application must be made within 28 days after—(a)if the person is given an information notice about the decision—the day the person is given the information notice; or(b)if paragraph (a) does not apply—the day the person otherwise becomes aware of the decision.(2)The chief health officer may, at any time, extend the time for applying for review.(3)The application for review must be in writing and state fully the grounds of the application.
(1)After reviewing the original decision, the chief health officer must make a further decision (the review decision) to—(a)confirm the original decision; or(b)amend the original decision; or(c)substitute another decision for the original decision.(2)The chief health officer must immediately give the applicant written notice of the review decision.(3)If the review decision is not the decision sought by the applicant, the notice must comply with the QCAT Act, section 157(2).(4)If the chief health officer does not give the notice mentioned in subsection (2) within 60 days after the application is made, the chief health officer is taken to have made a review decision confirming the original decision.(5)If the review decision confirms the original decision, for the purpose of a review of the review decision by QCAT, the original decision is taken to be the review decision.(6)If the review decision amends the original decision, for the purpose of a review of the review decision by QCAT, the original decision as amended is taken to be the review decision.s 129 amd 2009 No. 24s 1208
130Stay of operation of original decision
(1)If an application is made for an internal review of an original decision, the applicant may immediately apply, as provided under the QCAT Act, to QCAT for a stay of the decision.(2)QCAT may stay the decision to secure the effectiveness of the review and any later review.(3)The stay—(a)may be given on conditions QCAT considers appropriate; and(b)operates for the period fixed by QCAT; and(c)may be revoked or amended by QCAT.(4)The period of the stay must not extend past the time when the chief executive makes a review decision about the original decision and any later period QCAT allows the applicant to enable the applicant to apply for a review of the review decision.(5)An application under subsection (1) affects the original decision, or carrying out of the original decision, only if the original decision is stayed.s 130 prev s 130 om 2009 No. 24s 1209
pres s 130 ins 2009 No. 48s 171
div hdg sub 2009 No. 24s 1210
131Who may apply for external review
A person who has applied for the review of an original decision under division 1 and is dissatisfied with the review decision may apply, as provided under the QCAT Act, to QCAT for a review of the review decision.s 131 amd 2009 No. 24s 1211
s 132 om 2009 No. 24s 1212
s 133 om 2009 No. 24s 1212
s 134 om 2009 No. 24s 1212
s 135 om 2009 No. 24s 1212
s 136 om 2009 No. 24s 1212
137Application of div 1
This division applies to a proceeding under this Act.
It is not necessary to prove—(a)the chief health officer’s appointment; or(b)an authorised person’s appointment; or(c)the authority of the chief health officer or an authorised person to do anything under this Act.
A signature purporting to be the signature of the chief health officer or an authorised person is evidence of the signature it purports to be.
(1)A certificate purporting to be signed by the chief health officer stating any of the following matters is evidence of it—(a)a stated document is one of the following things made, given, issued or kept under this Act—(i)an appointment;(ii)an approval or licence;(iii)a decision;(iv)a notice, direction or requirement;(b)a stated document is a copy of a thing mentioned in paragraph (a);(c)on a stated day, or during a stated period, a stated person was or was not an authority holder;(d)on a stated day, or during a stated period, an authority—(i)was or was not in force; or(ii)was or was not subject to a stated condition; or(iii)was or was not suspended or cancelled;(e)on a stated day, or during a stated period, a person’s appointment as an authorised person was, or was not, in force;(f)on a stated day, a stated person was given a stated notice under this Act;(g)on a stated day, a stated requirement was made of a stated person.(2)A statement in a complaint for an offence against this Act that the matter of the complaint came to the knowledge of the complainant on a stated day is evidence of the matter stated.
141Summary proceedings for offences
(1)A proceeding for an offence against this Act must be taken in a summary way under the Justices Act 1886.(2)The proceeding must start—(a)within 1 year after the commission of the offence; or(b)within 6 months after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 2 years after the offence is committed.
142Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives
(1)This section applies in a proceeding for an offence against this Act.(2)If it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show—(a)the act was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and(b)the representative had the state of mind.(3)An act done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person could not, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, have prevented the act or omission.(4)In this section—representative means—(a)for a corporation—an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; or(b)for an individual—an employee or agent of the individual.state of mind, of a person, includes—(a)the person’s knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose; and(b)the person’s reasons for the intention, opinion, belief or purpose.s 142 amd 2001 No. 78s 189
143Executive officer may be taken to have committed offence against s 39
(1)If a corporation commits an offence against section 39, each executive officer of the corporation is taken to have also committed the offence if—(a)the officer authorised or permitted the corporation’s conduct constituting the offence; or(b)the officer was, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in the corporation’s conduct.(2)The executive officer may be proceeded against for, and convicted of, the offence against section 39 whether or not the corporation has been proceeded against for, or convicted of, the offence.(3)This section does not affect either of the following—(a)the liability of the corporation for the offence against section 39;(b)the liability, under the Criminal Code, chapter 2, of any person, whether or not the person is an executive officer of the corporation, for the offence against section 39.s 143 sub 2013 No. 51s 132
143AAuthority holder to notify chief health officer of certain events
(1)An authority holder must give the chief health officer notice, in the approved form, of the happening of any of the following events within 21 days of becoming aware of the event happening—(a)the authority holder, or an associate of the authority holder, is affected by bankruptcy action, or control action under the Corporations Act;(b)any of the following persons is convicted of an indictable offence or an offence against a corresponding law—(i)the authority holder;(ii)an associate of the authority holder;(iii)if the authority holder is a corporation, an executive officer of the authority holder;(c)the equivalent of an authority under a corresponding law, held by the authority holder or an associate of the authority holder, is suspended or cancelled;(d)if the authority holder is an individual who jointly holds the authority with 1 or more other individuals, the other individual or any of the other individuals dies.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)For subsection (1)(a), an authority holder or an associate of an authority holder is affected by bankruptcy action if the authority holder or associate—(a)is bankrupt; or(b)has compounded with creditors; or(c)as a debtor, has otherwise taken, or applied to take, advantage of any law about bankruptcy.(3)For subsection (1)(a), an authority holder or an associate of an authority holder is affected by control action under the Corporations Act if the authority holder or associate—(a)has executed a deed of company arrangement under that Act; or(b)is the subject of a winding-up (whether voluntarily or under a court order) under that Act; or(c)is the subject of an appointment of an administrator, liquidator, receiver or receiver and manager under that Act.s 143A ins 2001 No. 78s 190
amd 2003 No. 9s 63
(1)The licensee of a private health facility must give reports to the chief health officer as required by this section.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)The purposes of the reports are as follows—(a)to monitor the quality of health services provided at private health facilities;(b)to enable the State to give information to the Commonwealth or another State, or an entity of the Commonwealth or another State (the recipient), under an agreement with the recipient prescribed under a regulation for section 147(4)(c);(c)to monitor, analyse or evaluate public health having regard to the types and numbers of health services provided at the facilities.(3)The reports must—(a)be in the approved form; and(b)be given at the times prescribed under a regulation.s 144 amd 2005 No. 10s 50 sch
(1)A licensee must not give the chief health officer a report containing information that the licensee knows is false or misleading in a material particular.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(2)Subsection (1) does not apply to a licensee if the licensee, when giving the report—(a)tells the chief health officer, to the best of the licensee’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and(b)if the licensee has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information—gives the correct information.(3)In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1), it is enough to state that the report was, without specifying which, false or misleading.
146Protecting officials from liability
(1)An official is not civilly liable for an act done, or omission made, honestly and without negligence under this Act.(2)If subsection (1) prevents a civil liability attaching to an official, the liability attaches instead to the State.(3)In this section—official means—(a)the Minister; or(b)the chief executive; or(c)the chief health officer; or(d)an authorised person; or(e)a person acting under the direction of an authorised person.
147Confidentiality of information
(1)This section applies to the following persons—(a)a person who is, or was, the chief executive, the chief health officer or an authorised person;(b)another person who is, or was, involved in the administration of this Act, including, for example, as a health service employee or public service employee;(c)a member of an advisory committee;(d)a person who was involved in the administration of the repealed division.(2)This section applies to information obtained by a person to whom this section applies in the course of performing the person’s functions under this Act or under the repealed division.(3)The person must not disclose the information if—(a)the disclosure of the information would be likely to damage the commercial activities of the person to whom the information relates; or(b)the information is personal health information; or(c)the information is contained in a report under section 16.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(4)Subsection (3) does not apply if—(a)the information is disclosed—(i)in the performance of functions under this Act; or(ii)with the written consent of the person to whom the information relates; or(iii)to the person to whom the information relates; or(b)the information is otherwise publicly available; or(c)the information is given in the following circumstances—(i)the chief executive gives the information to the Commonwealth or another State, or an entity of the Commonwealth or another State (the recipient), under an agreement with the recipient;(ii)the agreement is prescribed under a regulation for this paragraph;(iii)the chief executive is satisfied the giving of the information is in the public interest; or(d)the information is disclosed to the chief executive to allow the chief executive to act under paragraph (c) or (h) or subsection (6); or(f)the disclosure of the information is required or permitted by an Act or another law; or(g)the disclosure of the information is authorised by the chief executive under subsection (6); or(h)the disclosure of the information is—(i)to a person authorised in writing by the chief executive to receive the information for evaluating, managing, monitoring or planning health services; or(ii)to an entity prescribed under a regulation for this subparagraph for the purpose of evaluating, managing, monitoring or planning health services as stated in the regulation.(6)For subsection (4)(g), the chief executive may authorise, in writing, the disclosure of information to a person if the chief executive believes, on reasonable grounds, the disclosure is in the public interest.(7)The Commonwealth, other State or entity that receives information under subsection (4)(c)—(a)must not give the information to anyone else, unless allowed to do so—(i)under an agreement mentioned in subsection (4)(c); or(ii)by the written consent of the chief executive; and(b)must ensure the information is used only for the purpose for which it was given.(8)If the chief executive authorises the disclosure of the information to a person under subsection (6), the person—(a)must not give the information to anyone else; and(b)must ensure the information is used only for the purpose for which it was given.Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(9)The chief executive must include in the department’s annual report under the Financial Accountability Act 2009 a statement about authorisations by the chief executive under subsection (6), including general details about—(a)the nature of the information given to persons under the authorisations; and(b)the purpose for which the information was given to the persons.(10)The statement under subsection (9) must not identify any person.(11)In this section—commercial activities means activities conducted on a commercial basis.information includes a document.personal health information means information about a person’s health that identifies, or is likely to identify, the person.s 147 amd 2005 No. 10s 50 sch; 2005 No. 48s 492sch 1; 2006 No. 46s 227; 2009 No. 9s 136sch 1
147AApplication of section 147 to person under Coroners Act 2003
Section 147 does not apply to the disclosure of information to a person who requires the information to perform a function under the Coroners Act 2003, other than the preparation of an annual report.s 147A ins 2003 No. 13s 106sch 1
147BDisclosure for funding arrangements
(1)Section 147 does not apply to the disclosure of information to the Commonwealth or an entity of the Commonwealth if the disclosure is to give effect to a funding arrangement between the State and the Commonwealth for public sector health services and other health services.(2)In this section—funding arrangement see Hospital and Health Boards Act 2011, schedule 2.public sector health service see Hospital and Health Boards Act 2011, schedule 2.s 147B ins 2012 No. 9s 53
147CDisclosure to the health ombudsman
Section 147 does not apply to the disclosure of information to the health ombudsman for a purpose of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013.s 147C ins 2014 No. 36s 331sch 1
147D Disclosure for purpose of Health Transparency Act 2019
Section 147 does not apply to the disclosure of information to any of the following persons who is performing a function under, or relating to the administration of, the Health Transparency Act 2019—(a)the chief executive;(b)an employee of the department;(c)a contractor who is contracted to provide information and communication technology or information management services to the department.
(1)The chief health officer may delegate the chief health officer’s powers under this Act to an appropriately qualified employee of the department.(2)However, the chief health officer may not delegate the chief health officer’s powers under—(a)part 3; or(b)part 9, division 1.(3)In this section—appropriately qualified includes having the qualifications, experience or standing appropriate to the exercise of the power.if a person is an officer of the department, the person’s classification level in the departments 148 amd 2005 No. 10s 50 sch; 2006 No. 46s 228
(1)The chief health officer may establish committees to advise the chief health officer on any matter regarding the administration of this Act.(2)Members of a committee established under this section must be appropriately qualified to advise the chief health officer on the matter about which the committee was established to advise.(3)Members of a committee may be appointed to the committee on the terms the chief health officer considers appropriate, including terms about remuneration.
(1)The chief health officer may approve forms for use under this Act.(2)An approved form may require—(a)specified information or documents to be included in, attached to or given with the form; or(b)the form, or information or documents included in, attached to or given with the form, to be verified in a specified way, including, for example, by statutory declaration.
(1)The Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.(2)A regulation may be made about fees, including the refunding of fees, for this Act.
152Definitions for pt 12
In this part—commencement day means the day on which the provision in which the term is used commences.consent means a written consent, given by the chief health officer to a person who intended to apply for a licence to erect or use under the repealed division, approving the establishment of a private health facility.existing licence to erect means a licence to erect in force immediately before the commencement day.existing licence to use means a licence to use in force immediately before the commencement day.licence to erect means a licence to erect under the repealed division.licence to use means a licence to use under the repealed division.
153References to repealed division
In an Act or document, a reference to the repealed division may, if the context permits, be taken as a reference to this Act.
(1)This section applies if, immediately before the commencement day—(a)a person held a consent; and(b)the person did not hold a licence to erect or use for the private health facility or proposed private health facility to which the consent related.(2)The person is taken to be an approval holder under this Act.(3)The consent is taken to be an approval under this Act.(4)An approval under subsection (3)—(a)is taken to have been issued—(i)on the same conditions as those subject to which the consent was subject immediately before the commencement day; and(ii)on the further condition that the approval holder must give the chief health officer, within 21 days after a prescribed change, written notice of the prescribed change; and(b)expires 1 year after the commencement day.(5)In this section—prescribed change means a change—(a)in a matter disclosed by the approval holder—(i)in the application for the consent; or(ii)in an application under this Act; and(b)of a kind prescribed under a regulation.
(1)An existing licence to erect is taken to be an approval under this Act.(2)A person who holds an existing licence to erect is taken to be an approval holder under this Act.(3)An approval under subsection (1)—(a)is taken to have been issued—(i)on the same conditions as those subject to which the existing licence to erect was subject immediately before the commencement day; and(ii)on the further condition that the approval holder must give the chief health officer, within 21 days after a prescribed change, written notice of the prescribed change; and(b)expires 1 year after the commencement day.(4)In this section—prescribed change means a change—(a)in a matter disclosed by the approval holder—(i)in the application for the existing licence to erect; or(ii)in an application under this Act; and(b)of a kind prescribed under a regulation.
(1)An existing licence to use is taken to be a licence under this Act.(2)A person who holds an existing licence to use is taken to be a licensee under this Act.(3)A licence under subsection (1) is taken to have been issued on the following conditions—(a)the licensee must give the chief health officer within 21 days of a prescribed change happening, written notice of the prescribed change;(b)within 90 days after the commencement day, the licensee must start a quality assurance program, conducted by a quality assurance entity, for the private health facility;(c)within 3 years after the commencement day, the licensee must receive certification from the quality assurance entity that the facility operates under a quality assurance system;(d)after the certification mentioned in paragraph (c) or subsection (4) is received, the facility must continue to be certified under the program as a facility that operates under a quality assurance system;(e)the licensee must comply with the standards relevant to the facility;(f)the licensee must operate the facility in accordance with the details about the facility stated in the licence, including providing at the facility only the type of health services stated in the licence;(g)the licensee must ensure the premises making up the facility and all equipment, fittings and furnishings in the facility are kept in good repair and operational order;(h)the licensee must not make a prescribed alteration to the facility without the approval of the chief health officer under section 65;(i)the other conditions, not inconsistent with the conditions set out in paragraphs (a) to (h), to which the existing licence to use was subject immediately before the commencement day.(4)Subsection (3)(b) and (c) do not apply if, on the commencement day, the licensee has received certification from a quality assurance entity that the facility operates under a quality assurance system.(5)Subsection (3)(b) does not apply if, on the commencement day, the licensee has started, but has not finished, a quality assurance program for the facility.(6)Section 74 does not apply to an instrument or document in force before the commencement day purporting to encumber a licence mentioned in subsection (1).(7)In this section—prescribed change means a change—(a)in a matter disclosed by the licensee—(i)in an application under the repealed division; or(ii)in an application under this Act; and(b)of a kind prescribed under a regulation.
(1)A pending application for a licence to use is taken to be an application for a licence under this Act.(2)A pending application for renewal of an existing licence to use is taken to be an application for renewal under this Act.(3)A pending application for approval to transfer an existing licence to use is taken to be an application for a transfer of a licence under this Act.(4)The provisions of this Act dealing with making an application for a licence or transfer of a licence in the approved form and paying the fee do not apply to the applications mentioned in subsections (1) and (3).(5)The provisions of this Act dealing with making an application for renewal in the approved form and paying the fee do not apply to the application mentioned in subsection (2).(6)The following kinds of pending applications are taken to have been withdrawn—(a)a pending application for a licence to erect;(b)a pending application for renewal of an existing licence to erect;(c)a pending application for approval to transfer an existing licence to erect.
158Action to cancel or suspend an existing licence to use
(1)This section applies if—(a)immediately before the commencement day, a person held an existing licence to use; and(b)the person received a notification under the repealed division of a day, time and place for the person to show cause why the existing licence to use should not be cancelled or suspended; and(c)the commencement day precedes the day notified.(2)The person may attempt to show cause as if this Act had not commenced.(3)The chief health officer may, after the person has attempted to show cause, cancel or suspend the licence as if this Act had not been passed.
(1)This section applies if an existing licence to use has been suspended under the repealed division and the period of suspension has not ended on the commencement day.(2)The suspension is taken to continue as a suspension of a licence under this Act.
160Proposed additions or alterations
(1)This section applies if—(a)immediately before the commencement day an approval of an addition or alteration given by the chief health officer under section 70 of the repealed division is in force; and(b)the addition or alteration has not been made.(2)The addition or alteration may be made as if this Act had not commenced.
(1)Proceedings for an offence against the repealed division may be started or continued, and the provisions of the repealed division and the Health Act 1937 that are necessary or convenient to be used in relation to the proceedings continue to apply, as if this Act had not commenced.(2)For subsection (1), the Acts Interpretation Act 1954, section 20 applies, but does not limit the subsection.
162Application of offence provision requiring licences for day hospitals and other provision
(1)This section applies if—(a)immediately before the commencement day—(i)a person operated a facility that, after the commencement day, is a day hospital; and(ii)the person did not have a licence to use under the repealed division for the day hospital; and(b)the person is required to be a licensee to operate the day hospital under this Act; and(c)the same health services are provided at the day hospital as were provided immediately before the commencement day.(2)Section 39 does not apply to the operation by the person of the day hospital until 6 months after the commencement day.
163Licences not required to operate certain day hospitals
(1)This section applies if—(a)immediately before the commencement day—(i)a person (the licensee) operated a facility (the licensee’s facility) and held a licence to use for the facility; and(ii)another person operated another facility, at the same place as the licensee’s facility, but did not hold a licence to use for the other facility; and(iii)the other facility was operated by the other person under the licence to use for the licensee’s facility; and(b)under this Act—(i)the licensee’s facility is a private hospital operated by the licensee under a licence; and(ii)the other facility is a day hospital operated by the other person.(2)For this Act, apart from this section—(a)the operation of the day hospital is part of the licensee’s operation of the private hospital; and(b)the other person does not operate the day hospital.(3)Subsection (2) stops applying at the earliest of the following times—(a)if the licence includes the statement mentioned in section 40(1)(c)—the day it first includes the statement;(b)the day the licence stops being in force;(c)1 year after the commencement day.
164Inclusion of statement in certain licences
(1)The chief health officer may include in a licence mentioned in section 163 the statement mentioned in section 40(1)(c).(2)If the chief health officer acts under subsection (1), section 40 applies as if the licensee asked, in an application to change the licence, for the licence to make the statement.
pt hdg ins 2003 No. 9s 64
165Validation of notices under s 12(3)
(1)The Private Health Facilities (Standards) Notice 2000 is, and is taken to have always been, as valid as if it had been published in the gazette on 24 November 2000.(2)The Private Health Facilities (Standards) Amendment Notice (No. 1) 2001 is, and is taken to have always been, as valid as if it had been published in the gazette on 23 November 2001.s 165 ins 2003 No. 9s 64
pt 14 (ss 166–168) ins 2008 No. 60s 17
166Definitions for pt 14
In this part—existing licences means the licences held by the Mater for the Mater private hospitals immediately before the commencement of this part.Mater private hospitals means the following hospitals located at South Brisbane—•Mater Misericordiae Private Hospital•Mater Misericordiae Women’s and Children’s Private Health Service.Mater public hospitals means the following hospitals located at South Brisbane—•Mater Adult Hospital•Mater Children’s Hospital•Mater Mothers’ Hospital.the Mater means Mater Misericordiae Health Services Brisbane Ltd (ACN 096 708 922).pt 14 (ss 166–168) ins 2008 No. 60s 17
167Mater public hospitals are private hospitals
To remove any doubt, it is declared that the Mater public hospitals are private hospitals for this Act.pt 14 (ss 166–168) ins 2008 No. 60s 17
168Chief health officer may issue licence
(1)Subject to subsection (2), the chief health officer must, under this part, issue a licence (the new licence) to the Mater for the Mater private hospitals and the Mater public hospitals.(2)To allow the chief health officer to issue the new licence, the Mater must, within 30 days after the commencement of this section, give the chief health officer an application for a licence, in the approved form mentioned in section 42(b), relating to the Mater private and public hospitals.(3)Sections 43 to 46 do not apply to the application.(4)The chief health officer must issue the new licence within 30 days after receiving the application.(5)The new licence replaces the existing licences and is taken to have been issued under part 6.(6)Without limiting subsection (5)—(a)part 6, divisions 4 to 7 apply to the new licence; and(b)for applying section 48, a reference in section 48(6), definition prescribed change, paragraph (a) to an application under this Act includes a reference to the application mentioned in subsection (2); and(c)section 48(1)(e) is not limited by anything in the existing agreement mentioned in the Mater Public Health Services Act 2008, section 9.pt 14 (ss 166–168) ins 2008 No. 60s 17
section 127(2)
Section | Description of decision |
19 | Refusing application for an approval |
23 | Issuing an approval on additional conditions |
27 | Refusing application to extend the period for which an approval remains in force |
29 | Changing the details stated in, or conditions of, an approval |
32 | Refusing application to change an approval |
38 | Refusing application for replacement of approval |
44 | Refusing application for a licence |
48 | Issuing a licence on additional conditions |
53 | Refusing to grant application for renewal of a licence |
55 | Changing the details stated in, or conditions of, a licence |
58 | Refusing application to change a licence |
65 | Refusing application for approval of a prescribed alteration |
70 | Refusing application to transfer a licence |
79 | Refusing application for replacement of a licence |
84 | Cancelling or suspending an authority |
85 | Immediately suspending a licence |
109 | Decision resulting in a thing being forfeited to the State |
sch 1 amd 2000 No. 46s 3sch
accepted representations see section 82.
admission, to a private health facility, includes allowing a person to enter the facility to receive health services at the facility.
approval means an approval under part 5.
approval holder means the holder of an approval.
associate, of an applicant for an authority or an authority holder, means—
(a)a corporation of which the applicant or authority holder is a subsidiary; or
(b)a party to an arrangement with the applicant or authority holder for the operation of the private health facility to which the application or authority relates; or
(c)a partner of the applicant or authority holder for the operation of the facility to which the application or authority relates.
authorised person means a person appointed as an authorised person under this Act.
authority means an approval or a licence.
authority holder means the holder of an authority.
building code means the edition, in force at the relevant time, of the Building Codes of Australia (including the Queensland Appendix) published by the body known as the Australian Building Codes Board.
certificate of classification means a certificate of classification issued under the Building Act 1975.
def certificate of classification amd 2006 No. 36s 101 sch
change notice—
•for part 5, division 5, subdivision 1—see section 32(3)
•for part 6, division 7, subdivision 1—see section 58(3).
chief health officer see the Hospital and Health Boards Act 2011, schedule 2.
def chief health officer amd 2005 No. 48s 492sch 1
sub 2011 No. 32s 332 sch 1pt 2 (amd 2012 No. 9s 47)
commencement day, for part 12, see section 152.
compliance notice see section 125(2).
consent, for part 12, see section 152.
corresponding law means a law of another State, the Commonwealth or a foreign country that provides for the same matter as this Act or a provision of this Act.
day hospital see section 10.
discharge, from a private health facility, includes allowing a person to leave the facility after the person has received health services at the facility.
document certification requirement see section 116(5).
document production requirement see section 116(6).
executive officer, of a corporation, means a person who is concerned with, or takes part in, the corporation’s management, whether or not the person is a director or the person’s position is given the name of executive officer.
existing licences, for part 14, see section 166.
def existing licences ins 2008 No. 60s 18
existing licence to erect see section 152.
existing licence to use see section 152.
facsimile warrant see section 97(4).
health service see section 7.
information notice, for a decision made by the chief health officer or an authorised person, is a written notice stating the following—
(a)the decision;
(b)the reasons for the decision;
(c)that the person to whom the notice is given may have the decision reviewed within 28 days;
(d)the way the person may have the decision reviewed;
(e)if the decision is that an authority be suspended or cancelled, a direction that the person surrender the authority within 7 days after receiving the notice;
(f)if the decision is to change an authority, a direction that the person return the authority to record the change within 7 days after receiving the notice.
internal review see section 127(1).
licence means a licence under part 6.
licence to erect see section 152.
licence to use see section 152.
licensee means the holder of a licence.
Mater private hospitals, for part 14, see section 166.
def Mater private hospitals ins 2008 No. 60s 18
Mater public hospitals, for part 14, see section 166.
def Mater public hospitals ins 2008 No. 60s 18
notice of intention—
•for part 5, division 5—see section 29(3)
•for part 6, division 7—see section 55(3).
original decision see section 127(1).
patient means a person admitted to a private health facility to receive a health service.
place of seizure see section 105(a).
premises includes—
(a)a building or other structure; and
(b)land where a building or other structure is situated; and
(c)part of the building, other structure or land.
prescribed alteration, to a private health facility, see section 62(1).
private health facility see section 8.
private hospital see section 9.
public place means a place the public is entitled to use, open to the public or used by the public, whether or not on payment of money.
quality assurance entity means an entity prescribed under a regulation that conducts a quality assurance program.
quality assurance program means a program, prescribed under a regulation, for certifying that a private health facility operates under a quality assurance system.
repealed division means the Health Act 1937, part 3, division 4, as in force from time to time before its omission by this Act.
review decision see section 129(1).
review notice ...
def review notice om 2009 No. 24s 1213
show cause notice see section 81(2).
show cause period—
•for part 5, division 5—see section 29(3)
•for part 6, division 7—see section 55(3)
•for part 7—see section 81.
special warrant see section 97(1).
standard means a standard made under part 3.
subsidiary has the same meaning as under the Corporations Act.
def subsidiary amd 2001 No. 45s 29sch 3
the Mater, for part 14, see section 166.
def the Mater ins 2008 No. 60s 18
transfer notice see section 70(3).
warrant form see section 97(5).